Busy busy busy

For some reason, I’ve had more material for posting in the past few weeks than just about ever.  I’ve had a 2-3 day backlog of news all this time.  I’m not complaining, mind you, I’m just thrilled that there’s this much going on.

10 years of religion

Bruce Perens has put together a summary for the first decade of open source.  It’s a call to arms, not a news report. though that should not be a surprise.

This being a BSD-centric publication, I have to quibble: He defines open source as having started by his writing about it, 10 years ago, which seems somewhat arbitrary.  Also, he claims the GPLv3 is the ‘strongest’ open source license possible on the basis that people have been looking at it.  I’d argue that the BSD license has already made it through court.   The biggest problem these days appears to be patent law, which is certainly vulnerable to challenge.  (Via OnLAMP)

Non-code contributions

Matthias Schmidt sent along a link to an Undeadly article that details how Will Backman made a major improvement for OpenBSD’s SNMP support without writing any code. “I want to contribute but I’m not a coder” is a common refrain for open-source projects, including DragonFly, and we would benefit from similar testing.

As for examples of non-code contributions: Will Backman is also known for BSDTalk.  In addition, there’s what you are reading right now

BSD magazine site up

As mentioned here before and now on FreeBSD – the Unknown Giant, there will soon be “BSD Magazine“. It’s due out in 2Q 2008.

Digging around on the site shows some promotional material that says “Linux” where it should say “BSD”. This is probably because it’s repurposed from one of Software Media LLC’s other publications.  It should be interesting.  If you have a itch to write, they are taking submissions, though it sounds like they’ve already got the first issue ready.

2.0 release dated

2.0 will be branched on the 9th and released on the 23rd of this month.  If you have something you want in that release, hurry!  HAMMER will be included in an alpha state.

rsync vs. cvsup

Vincent Stemen did a good amount of testing of cvsup vs. rsync in terms of update speed. Rsync came out way ahead, though as a few people noted, rsyncd’s load relative to cvsupd on a server serving many clients is unknown. In any case, cvsup does not build on DragonFly via pkgsrc, so it looks like rsync is generally a better choice, plus most mirrors are using it now. HAMMER may provide a better alternative, in any case.

While on the topic: Ulf Lilleengen’s blog post about improving csup.