Pedro F. Giffuni brought up the idea of using subversion instead of cvs for storing DragonFly source. Bakul Shah pointed out that subversion was not yet mature enough for a switch from cvs in his experience, and Matt said we are continuing with cvs.
2 Replies to “Short subversion discussion”
Comments are closed.
It appears as though Mr. Dillon prefers to stick with cvs. It may not be the best thing around (I like it) but it’s something that many people are familliar with.
What about the GNU/Arch(*) project? Its aim seems to
be very interesting ; are there any experience (good
or bad) with this revision control system?
(*)http://www.gnu.org/directory/sysadmin/Version_control/arch.html