Short subversion discussion

Pedro F. Giffuni brought up the idea of using subversion instead of cvs for storing DragonFly source. Bakul Shah pointed out that subversion was not yet mature enough for a switch from cvs in his experience, and Matt said we are continuing with cvs.

2 Replies to “Short subversion discussion”

  1. DragonFly_Guy says:

    It appears as though Mr. Dillon prefers to stick with cvs. It may not be the best thing around (I like it) but it’s something that many people are familliar with.

  2. Julien Gabel says:

    What about the GNU/Arch(*) project? Its aim seems to
    be very interesting ; are there any experience (good
    or bad) with this revision control system?


Comments are closed.