8 Replies to “Never too many cores”

  1. What do you think of the message

    malloc_uninit: 120 bytes of ‘HAMMER2-chains’ still allocated on cpu 110
    kthread 0xfffffae0e28dd300 syncer3 has exited
    vflush: Warning, cannot destroy busy device vnode
    unmount of filesystem mounted from devfs failed (BUSY)

    associated with the system shutdown at the end?

  2. Eric – I think it’s a timing issue. That’s an automatic note that happens when one process is trying to unmount a device while another device is still using it. There’s no harm – it just keeps retrying until the device isn’t being used any more.

    I’m not the authoritative answer, though – a good question for IRC.

    T – a virtual computer pulling from a huge inventory.

  3. Justin

    When you say:


    T – a virtual computer pulling from a huge inventory.

    What do you mean by “huge inventory”?

    I didn’t even know there were x86 systems that had 11+ sockets.

    Is this some type of multi-node cluster that is appearing as a single server?

  4. Wow. Would love to read an article on running Dfly on this beast.

    @zrj, in case you read this comment. Please blog about this beast. Would be fascinating read.

Comments are closed.

To respond on your own website, enter the URL of your response which should contain a link to this post's permalink URL. Your response will then appear (possibly after moderation) on this page. Want to update or remove your response? Update or delete your post and re-enter your post's URL again. (Find out more about Webmentions.)

Mentions

  • Anonymous
  • T
  • Anonymous
  • Justin Sherrill
  • T
  • Justin Sherrill
  • T
  • Eric Olson