<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Lazy Reading for 2022/01/16	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.dragonflydigest.com/2022/01/16/lazy-reading-for-2022-01-16/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.dragonflydigest.com/2022/01/16/lazy-reading-for-2022-01-16/</link>
	<description>A running description of activity related to DragonFly BSD.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 17 Jan 2022 16:27:38 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=7.0.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Justin Sherrill		</title>
		<link>https://www.dragonflydigest.com/2022/01/16/lazy-reading-for-2022-01-16/comment-page-1/#comment-490592</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Justin Sherrill]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Jan 2022 16:27:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.dragonflydigest.com/?p=26553#comment-490592</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.dragonflydigest.com/2022/01/16/lazy-reading-for-2022-01-16/comment-page-1/#comment-490590&quot;&gt;Felix&lt;/a&gt;.

Yeah, that&#039;s the trade-off: reinventing the wheel vs having the existing wheels overwhelm new development.  On the other hand, you could argue everyone should still be using nvi, but it&#039;s the jump to new platforms that brought new editors.  For instance.

I mentioned that cause I loved Programmer&#039;s Editor (Pe) on BeOS, and BBEdit on MacOS, and those were very distinct to the operating system they ran on.  Heck, vi/emacs are Unixish all the way through.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://www.dragonflydigest.com/2022/01/16/lazy-reading-for-2022-01-16/comment-page-1/#comment-490590">Felix</a>.</p>
<p>Yeah, that&#8217;s the trade-off: reinventing the wheel vs having the existing wheels overwhelm new development.  On the other hand, you could argue everyone should still be using nvi, but it&#8217;s the jump to new platforms that brought new editors.  For instance.</p>
<p>I mentioned that cause I loved Programmer&#8217;s Editor (Pe) on BeOS, and BBEdit on MacOS, and those were very distinct to the operating system they ran on.  Heck, vi/emacs are Unixish all the way through.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Felix		</title>
		<link>https://www.dragonflydigest.com/2022/01/16/lazy-reading-for-2022-01-16/comment-page-1/#comment-490590</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Felix]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Jan 2022 04:55:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.dragonflydigest.com/?p=26553#comment-490590</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I don&#039;t see many people developing native apps for Haiku. I was hoping to get into it, and never got around to even installing the OS. And I&#039;ve been following its development for a long time now.

Besides, do we really have to keep reinventing the wheel by making new apps for the same tasks on every single operating system out there? Don&#039;t we have anything better to do with our time and energy? Whether we&#039;re talking personal energy or electricity.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t see many people developing native apps for Haiku. I was hoping to get into it, and never got around to even installing the OS. And I&#8217;ve been following its development for a long time now.</p>
<p>Besides, do we really have to keep reinventing the wheel by making new apps for the same tasks on every single operating system out there? Don&#8217;t we have anything better to do with our time and energy? Whether we&#8217;re talking personal energy or electricity.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Justin Sherrill		</title>
		<link>https://www.dragonflydigest.com/2022/01/16/lazy-reading-for-2022-01-16/comment-page-1/#comment-490589</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Justin Sherrill]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 16 Jan 2022 23:40:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.dragonflydigest.com/?p=26553#comment-490589</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I know what X11 compatibility gets you; the issue is that it can squeeze out native app development.  It keeps your own platform from developing anything unique or better.

This was an early question for BeOS; I think Jean Louis-Gassee talked about it at one point, but I don&#039;t have a link handy to show.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I know what X11 compatibility gets you; the issue is that it can squeeze out native app development.  It keeps your own platform from developing anything unique or better.</p>
<p>This was an early question for BeOS; I think Jean Louis-Gassee talked about it at one point, but I don&#8217;t have a link handy to show.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Felix		</title>
		<link>https://www.dragonflydigest.com/2022/01/16/lazy-reading-for-2022-01-16/comment-page-1/#comment-490588</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Felix]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 16 Jan 2022 14:21:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.dragonflydigest.com/?p=26553#comment-490588</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[X11 compatibility means you can port a mind-boggling amount of software with minimal effort. X11 works. It&#039;s not perfect, sure, but it works. We really, really don&#039;t need to reinvent the wheel all the time. And we definitely don&#039;t need to make it square just because round is kinda boring by now. Some things are supposed to be boring.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>X11 compatibility means you can port a mind-boggling amount of software with minimal effort. X11 works. It&#8217;s not perfect, sure, but it works. We really, really don&#8217;t need to reinvent the wheel all the time. And we definitely don&#8217;t need to make it square just because round is kinda boring by now. Some things are supposed to be boring.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
