<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Lazy Reading for 2019/12/29	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.dragonflydigest.com/2019/12/29/lazy-reading-for-2019-12-29/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.dragonflydigest.com/2019/12/29/lazy-reading-for-2019-12-29/</link>
	<description>A running description of activity related to DragonFly BSD.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 29 Dec 2019 14:45:02 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Felix		</title>
		<link>https://www.dragonflydigest.com/2019/12/29/lazy-reading-for-2019-12-29/comment-page-1/#comment-488616</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Felix]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Dec 2019 14:45:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.dragonflydigest.com/?p=23949#comment-488616</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Good article about starting a blog. I wrote similar thoughts upon starting my current one in August 2018. But even people who have one still insist to kick up tweetstorms for some reason. And you&#039;re right to worry about the future of your site. Going back to handcrafted HTML can he a long, arduous task, but it&#039;s also liberating, and rewarding, for several reasons. (Shameless plug: &lt;a href=&quot;https://felix.plesoianu.ro/web/plain-old-webpages.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow ugc&quot;&gt;I wrote about that, too&lt;/a&gt;.)

I disagree however about the use of tools. I seriously doubt BashBlog will stop working before web browsers do, seeing how it only requires Bash and a POSIX userland. Or OddMuse, a single Perl script that only requires commonly preinstalled modules. The big static site generators, that require half of PyPI, or worse, npm? Yeah, those are a problem. Their output is still future-proof to a much bigger degree than any dynamic web app, and that matters.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good article about starting a blog. I wrote similar thoughts upon starting my current one in August 2018. But even people who have one still insist to kick up tweetstorms for some reason. And you&#8217;re right to worry about the future of your site. Going back to handcrafted HTML can he a long, arduous task, but it&#8217;s also liberating, and rewarding, for several reasons. (Shameless plug: <a href="https://felix.plesoianu.ro/web/plain-old-webpages.html" rel="nofollow ugc">I wrote about that, too</a>.)</p>
<p>I disagree however about the use of tools. I seriously doubt BashBlog will stop working before web browsers do, seeing how it only requires Bash and a POSIX userland. Or OddMuse, a single Perl script that only requires commonly preinstalled modules. The big static site generators, that require half of PyPI, or worse, npm? Yeah, those are a problem. Their output is still future-proof to a much bigger degree than any dynamic web app, and that matters.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
