<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: HAMMER2 and fsck for review	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.dragonflydigest.com/2019/09/24/hammer2-and-fsck-for-review/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.dragonflydigest.com/2019/09/24/hammer2-and-fsck-for-review/</link>
	<description>A running description of activity related to DragonFly BSD.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 26 Sep 2019 07:35:55 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=7.1.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Anon2		</title>
		<link>https://www.dragonflydigest.com/2019/09/24/hammer2-and-fsck-for-review/comment-page-1/#comment-488367</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anon2]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Sep 2019 07:35:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.dragonflydigest.com/?p=23540#comment-488367</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[@Anonymous

at least AWS checks the underlying storage for you ( -&#062; https://docs.aws.amazon.com/AWSEC2/latest/UserGuide/monitoring-volume-status.html )

So running fsck is considered harmful https://unix.stackexchange.com/questions/45422/should-i-run-fsck-on-boot-for-an-amazon-ec2-image]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Anonymous</p>
<p>at least AWS checks the underlying storage for you ( -&gt; <a href="https://docs.aws.amazon.com/AWSEC2/latest/UserGuide/monitoring-volume-status.html" rel="nofollow ugc">https://docs.aws.amazon.com/AWSEC2/latest/UserGuide/monitoring-volume-status.html</a> )</p>
<p>So running fsck is considered harmful <a href="https://unix.stackexchange.com/questions/45422/should-i-run-fsck-on-boot-for-an-amazon-ec2-image" rel="nofollow ugc">https://unix.stackexchange.com/questions/45422/should-i-run-fsck-on-boot-for-an-amazon-ec2-image</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Anonymous		</title>
		<link>https://www.dragonflydigest.com/2019/09/24/hammer2-and-fsck-for-review/comment-page-1/#comment-488366</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Sep 2019 23:35:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.dragonflydigest.com/?p=23540#comment-488366</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[How spinning up a new compute node on an IaaS service like AWS, Google Cloud etc - should the first thing you do is run fsck to ensure you were provisioned a compute node with a bad disk?

I know with cheaper cloud services they get super aggressive in reusing repaired hard drives.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How spinning up a new compute node on an IaaS service like AWS, Google Cloud etc &#8211; should the first thing you do is run fsck to ensure you were provisioned a compute node with a bad disk?</p>
<p>I know with cheaper cloud services they get super aggressive in reusing repaired hard drives.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
