<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: In Other BSDs for 2018/06/23	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.dragonflydigest.com/2018/06/23/in-other-bsds-for-2018-06-23/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.dragonflydigest.com/2018/06/23/in-other-bsds-for-2018-06-23/</link>
	<description>A running description of activity related to DragonFly BSD.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 29 Jun 2018 03:32:05 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=7.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: rjc		</title>
		<link>https://www.dragonflydigest.com/2018/06/23/in-other-bsds-for-2018-06-23/comment-page-1/#comment-487431</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[rjc]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Jun 2018 03:32:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.dragonflydigest.com/?p=21432#comment-487431</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I would like to point out that any such comparison, by its very nature, will be skewed in favour of whomever has produced it - otherwise, there is simply no point in doing such a thing and one might simply point the reader towards an unbiased comparison done by an independent 3rd-party.

There are quite a few cherry-picked features from HardenedBSD, for which an exact equivalent might either not exist or a different solution is being used elsewhere. At the same time, other security enhancements and exploit mitigations have been omitted from said comparison - https://www.openbsd.org/innovations.html

Just to be clear, I have nothing against HardenedBSD - I wish FreeBSD just adopted more (all?) of the enhancements, the former project has done.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would like to point out that any such comparison, by its very nature, will be skewed in favour of whomever has produced it &#8211; otherwise, there is simply no point in doing such a thing and one might simply point the reader towards an unbiased comparison done by an independent 3rd-party.</p>
<p>There are quite a few cherry-picked features from HardenedBSD, for which an exact equivalent might either not exist or a different solution is being used elsewhere. At the same time, other security enhancements and exploit mitigations have been omitted from said comparison &#8211; <a href="https://www.openbsd.org/innovations.html" rel="nofollow ugc">https://www.openbsd.org/innovations.html</a></p>
<p>Just to be clear, I have nothing against HardenedBSD &#8211; I wish FreeBSD just adopted more (all?) of the enhancements, the former project has done.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Anonymous		</title>
		<link>https://www.dragonflydigest.com/2018/06/23/in-other-bsds-for-2018-06-23/comment-page-1/#comment-487422</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 Jun 2018 14:37:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.dragonflydigest.com/?p=21432#comment-487422</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Re: HardenedBSD since it&#039;s mentioned above.

https://hardenedbsd.org/content/easy-feature-comparison

Linked above is an interesting comparison of all BSD security features.

Looks like HardenedBSD might be more secure than OpenBSD.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Re: HardenedBSD since it&#8217;s mentioned above.</p>
<p><a href="https://hardenedbsd.org/content/easy-feature-comparison" rel="nofollow ugc">https://hardenedbsd.org/content/easy-feature-comparison</a></p>
<p>Linked above is an interesting comparison of all BSD security features.</p>
<p>Looks like HardenedBSD might be more secure than OpenBSD.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
