<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Lazy Reading for 2018/03/18	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.dragonflydigest.com/2018/03/18/lazy-reading-for-2018-03-17/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.dragonflydigest.com/2018/03/18/lazy-reading-for-2018-03-17/</link>
	<description>A running description of activity related to DragonFly BSD.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 18 Mar 2018 15:56:25 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Felix		</title>
		<link>https://www.dragonflydigest.com/2018/03/18/lazy-reading-for-2018-03-17/comment-page-1/#comment-487290</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Felix]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 Mar 2018 15:56:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.dragonflydigest.com/?p=20968#comment-487290</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Yay, someone remembers the Jupiter Ace!

On a different note, maybe the reason Linux distros have trouble packaging anything made with Node is that npm is absolutely terrible. Twice already hundreds of packages in there were totaled by one dev removing one lib made of one little function it would have been easier to inline, or heck, reimplement. And that&#039;s just the high-profile cases everyone&#039;s heard about. So maybe, just maybe, we don&#039;t want to blame everyone else for refusing to deal with that insanity.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yay, someone remembers the Jupiter Ace!</p>
<p>On a different note, maybe the reason Linux distros have trouble packaging anything made with Node is that npm is absolutely terrible. Twice already hundreds of packages in there were totaled by one dev removing one lib made of one little function it would have been easier to inline, or heck, reimplement. And that&#8217;s just the high-profile cases everyone&#8217;s heard about. So maybe, just maybe, we don&#8217;t want to blame everyone else for refusing to deal with that insanity.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
