<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: In Other BSDs for 2017/11/25	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.dragonflydigest.com/2017/11/25/in-other-bsds-for-2017-11-25/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.dragonflydigest.com/2017/11/25/in-other-bsds-for-2017-11-25/</link>
	<description>A running description of activity related to DragonFly BSD.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 26 Nov 2017 09:07:46 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: mer		</title>
		<link>https://www.dragonflydigest.com/2017/11/25/in-other-bsds-for-2017-11-25/comment-page-1/#comment-487035</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[mer]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 26 Nov 2017 09:07:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.dragonflydigest.com/?p=20489#comment-487035</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Ahh fortune wars.   One aspect of the FreeBSD thing is the move was apparently unilateral (at least from just looking at the maiing list);  I don&#039;t know if it was or or was not, just that&#039;s the way it looked.
I&#039;ve been doing this long enough I understand that something that used to be inoffensive is now offensive, but the idea of completely obliterating history is often the wrong move;  leads to repetition of that history.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ahh fortune wars.   One aspect of the FreeBSD thing is the move was apparently unilateral (at least from just looking at the maiing list);  I don&#8217;t know if it was or or was not, just that&#8217;s the way it looked.<br />
I&#8217;ve been doing this long enough I understand that something that used to be inoffensive is now offensive, but the idea of completely obliterating history is often the wrong move;  leads to repetition of that history.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
