<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: DragonFly 4.2 and 4.0.6 branched	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.dragonflydigest.com/2015/06/12/dragonfly-4-2-and-4-0-6-branched/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.dragonflydigest.com/2015/06/12/dragonfly-4-2-and-4-0-6-branched/</link>
	<description>A running description of activity related to DragonFly BSD.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 13 Jun 2015 14:13:16 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=7.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Justin Sherrill		</title>
		<link>https://www.dragonflydigest.com/2015/06/12/dragonfly-4-2-and-4-0-6-branched/comment-page-1/#comment-346971</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Justin Sherrill]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Jun 2015 14:13:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dragonflydigest.com/?p=16249#comment-346971</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Hm.  I thought they weren&#039;t built, and there was already two people on IRC saying &quot;I built 4.2 and pkg doesn&#039;t work&quot;, meaning that they couldn&#039;t download images with it.  Maybe they were actually on master or I&#039;m misremembering.  

I haven&#039;t had an image to test, though I plan to later today.  Article is corrected.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hm.  I thought they weren&#8217;t built, and there was already two people on IRC saying &#8220;I built 4.2 and pkg doesn&#8217;t work&#8221;, meaning that they couldn&#8217;t download images with it.  Maybe they were actually on master or I&#8217;m misremembering.  </p>
<p>I haven&#8217;t had an image to test, though I plan to later today.  Article is corrected.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: John		</title>
		<link>https://www.dragonflydigest.com/2015/06/12/dragonfly-4-2-and-4-0-6-branched/comment-page-1/#comment-346959</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[John]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Jun 2015 10:25:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dragonflydigest.com/?p=16249#comment-346959</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[FYI: http://avalon.dragonflybsd.org/dports/dragonfly:4.2:x86:64/]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>FYI: <a href="http://avalon.dragonflybsd.org/dports/dragonfly:4.2:x86:64/" rel="nofollow ugc">http://avalon.dragonflybsd.org/dports/dragonfly:4.2:x86:64/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: John		</title>
		<link>https://www.dragonflydigest.com/2015/06/12/dragonfly-4-2-and-4-0-6-branched/comment-page-1/#comment-346958</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[John]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Jun 2015 10:20:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dragonflydigest.com/?p=16249#comment-346958</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[&quot;Note that packages for 4.2 are not yet built, so you’ll have to manually specify a package path to install with pkg on 4.2 – for now.. That won’t be the case for the actual release, of course.&quot;

This is pretty much 100% false.

packages for 4.2 have been available for MONTHS.  The newest is only a couple of days old.  packages for 4.4 (dev  branch 4.3) are not available.  Those people will need to specify 4.2.

I would have thought &quot;4.2&quot; was a typo, but the last clause &quot;won&#039;t be the cause for actual release&quot; makes no sense, unless you are talking about the 4.4 release in 6 months.

I think the entry should be re-written because it&#039;s misleading in a way that can cause real confusion.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Note that packages for 4.2 are not yet built, so you’ll have to manually specify a package path to install with pkg on 4.2 – for now.. That won’t be the case for the actual release, of course.&#8221;</p>
<p>This is pretty much 100% false.</p>
<p>packages for 4.2 have been available for MONTHS.  The newest is only a couple of days old.  packages for 4.4 (dev  branch 4.3) are not available.  Those people will need to specify 4.2.</p>
<p>I would have thought &#8220;4.2&#8221; was a typo, but the last clause &#8220;won&#8217;t be the cause for actual release&#8221; makes no sense, unless you are talking about the 4.4 release in 6 months.</p>
<p>I think the entry should be re-written because it&#8217;s misleading in a way that can cause real confusion.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
