<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: In Other BSDs for 2014/07/12	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.dragonflydigest.com/2014/07/12/in-other-bsds-for-20140712/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.dragonflydigest.com/2014/07/12/in-other-bsds-for-20140712/</link>
	<description>A running description of activity related to DragonFly BSD.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 16 Jul 2014 06:28:25 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Billy Larlad		</title>
		<link>https://www.dragonflydigest.com/2014/07/12/in-other-bsds-for-20140712/comment-page-1/#comment-175507</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Billy Larlad]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Jul 2014 06:28:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.shiningsilence.com/dbsdlog/?p=14338#comment-175507</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[And now lynx is gone from OpenBSD base!

Also, gopher sounds neat in principle. I enjoy finding old books about the internet that spend chapters on Gopher.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And now lynx is gone from OpenBSD base!</p>
<p>Also, gopher sounds neat in principle. I enjoy finding old books about the internet that spend chapters on Gopher.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Justin Sherrill		</title>
		<link>https://www.dragonflydigest.com/2014/07/12/in-other-bsds-for-20140712/comment-page-1/#comment-174018</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Justin Sherrill]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Jul 2014 12:21:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.shiningsilence.com/dbsdlog/?p=14338#comment-174018</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[_Did_ anyone ever use gopher?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>_Did_ anyone ever use gopher?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Anonymous		</title>
		<link>https://www.dragonflydigest.com/2014/07/12/in-other-bsds-for-20140712/comment-page-1/#comment-173656</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Jul 2014 22:54:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.shiningsilence.com/dbsdlog/?p=14338#comment-173656</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Does anyone use gopher?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Does anyone use gopher?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Billy Larlad		</title>
		<link>https://www.dragonflydigest.com/2014/07/12/in-other-bsds-for-20140712/comment-page-1/#comment-173279</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Billy Larlad]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Jul 2014 08:56:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.shiningsilence.com/dbsdlog/?p=14338#comment-173279</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I guess the update to Lynx in OpenBSD has sparked a surprisingly heated debate on the OpenBSD tech mailing list about whether gopher (and other protocol) support should be stripped out of the version of Lynx that is in the base, or indeed whether Lynx should be removed entirely from base.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I guess the update to Lynx in OpenBSD has sparked a surprisingly heated debate on the OpenBSD tech mailing list about whether gopher (and other protocol) support should be stripped out of the version of Lynx that is in the base, or indeed whether Lynx should be removed entirely from base.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Anonymous		</title>
		<link>https://www.dragonflydigest.com/2014/07/12/in-other-bsds-for-20140712/comment-page-1/#comment-172906</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Jul 2014 21:27:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.shiningsilence.com/dbsdlog/?p=14338#comment-172906</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Our Baptiste is now in the FreeBSD Core team, that&#039;s pretty cool.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Our Baptiste is now in the FreeBSD Core team, that&#8217;s pretty cool.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Franco Fichtner		</title>
		<link>https://www.dragonflydigest.com/2014/07/12/in-other-bsds-for-20140712/comment-page-1/#comment-172823</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Franco Fichtner]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Jul 2014 18:52:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.shiningsilence.com/dbsdlog/?p=14338#comment-172823</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Oh, and none of those early patches have made its way into FreeBSD up until now. But I might have missed them. I&#039;d appreciate it if anybody else knows more.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh, and none of those early patches have made its way into FreeBSD up until now. But I might have missed them. I&#8217;d appreciate it if anybody else knows more.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Franco Fichtner		</title>
		<link>https://www.dragonflydigest.com/2014/07/12/in-other-bsds-for-20140712/comment-page-1/#comment-172822</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Franco Fichtner]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Jul 2014 18:50:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.shiningsilence.com/dbsdlog/?p=14338#comment-172822</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[That FreeBSD pf thread is interesting, although the patches mentioned by pfSense guys (Jim and Ermal) haven&#039;t been seen in the wild. I did code audits for older FreeBSD 10 patches based on pfSense 2.2 alpha (patches which have now disappeared since they are not directly BSD licensed anymore -- long story) that they had and one reliably crashed the kernel, others were of unclear quality.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That FreeBSD pf thread is interesting, although the patches mentioned by pfSense guys (Jim and Ermal) haven&#8217;t been seen in the wild. I did code audits for older FreeBSD 10 patches based on pfSense 2.2 alpha (patches which have now disappeared since they are not directly BSD licensed anymore &#8212; long story) that they had and one reliably crashed the kernel, others were of unclear quality.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
