<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Still using ISA cards?  A few more drivers removed	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.dragonflydigest.com/2012/12/04/still-using-isa-cards-a-few-more-drivers-removed/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.dragonflydigest.com/2012/12/04/still-using-isa-cards-a-few-more-drivers-removed/</link>
	<description>A running description of activity related to DragonFly BSD.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 12 Dec 2012 03:57:39 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Samuel J. Greear		</title>
		<link>https://www.dragonflydigest.com/2012/12/04/still-using-isa-cards-a-few-more-drivers-removed/comment-page-1/#comment-45963</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Samuel J. Greear]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Dec 2012 03:57:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.shiningsilence.com/dbsdlog/?p=10796#comment-45963</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Anonymous, the answer is in short, &quot;yes&quot;. Code does not exist in a vacuum, it requires maintenance to keep pace with the rest of the kernel. The ISA stuff has been on the chopping block for a long time. It basically boils down to this, if we are pretty sure nobody is using it and nobody ever will use it, we will wait another year or two -- and then remove it. If we end up being wrong, we can certainly bring code back (so feel free to yell if something you actually need has been removed), but we can&#039;t just keep everything around because someone might want to maybe use it someday, it increases the maintenance burden and often presents obstacles to &quot;modernizing&quot; various subsystems.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Anonymous, the answer is in short, &#8220;yes&#8221;. Code does not exist in a vacuum, it requires maintenance to keep pace with the rest of the kernel. The ISA stuff has been on the chopping block for a long time. It basically boils down to this, if we are pretty sure nobody is using it and nobody ever will use it, we will wait another year or two &#8212; and then remove it. If we end up being wrong, we can certainly bring code back (so feel free to yell if something you actually need has been removed), but we can&#8217;t just keep everything around because someone might want to maybe use it someday, it increases the maintenance burden and often presents obstacles to &#8220;modernizing&#8221; various subsystems.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Edward O'Callaghan		</title>
		<link>https://www.dragonflydigest.com/2012/12/04/still-using-isa-cards-a-few-more-drivers-removed/comment-page-1/#comment-45941</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Edward O'Callaghan]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Dec 2012 09:03:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.shiningsilence.com/dbsdlog/?p=10796#comment-45941</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[At last!]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>At last!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Anonymous		</title>
		<link>https://www.dragonflydigest.com/2012/12/04/still-using-isa-cards-a-few-more-drivers-removed/comment-page-1/#comment-45937</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Dec 2012 16:13:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.shiningsilence.com/dbsdlog/?p=10796#comment-45937</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I always wonder *why* they would remove ISA drivers.
Do they require extensive work to keep up to date with new releases?

I have a sizeable collection of old computers. Some of which still have ISA cards.
I can always run older versions of an operating system that does still have the drivers, but still...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I always wonder *why* they would remove ISA drivers.<br />
Do they require extensive work to keep up to date with new releases?</p>
<p>I have a sizeable collection of old computers. Some of which still have ISA cards.<br />
I can always run older versions of an operating system that does still have the drivers, but still&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
