<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Do you have an ixbge(4)?	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.dragonflydigest.com/2012/09/12/do-you-have-an-ixbge4/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.dragonflydigest.com/2012/09/12/do-you-have-an-ixbge4/</link>
	<description>A running description of activity related to DragonFly BSD.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 13 Sep 2012 09:41:35 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: François Tigeot		</title>
		<link>https://www.dragonflydigest.com/2012/09/12/do-you-have-an-ixbge4/comment-page-1/#comment-45233</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[François Tigeot]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Sep 2012 09:41:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.shiningsilence.com/dbsdlog/?p=10366#comment-45233</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[This ixgbe driver should work with all recent Intel 10G ethernet nics, both 82598 and 82599 based.
The X520 and X540 are among the list; I&#039;ve tested the driver with a pair of X520 10G-baseT adapters.

The net.inet.tcp.sosend_agglim sysctl should not be used blindly; setting it to 12 will increase latency on 1Gb/s connections.
Sepherosa Ziehau is planning to make this sysctl device specific in the future.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This ixgbe driver should work with all recent Intel 10G ethernet nics, both 82598 and 82599 based.<br />
The X520 and X540 are among the list; I&#8217;ve tested the driver with a pair of X520 10G-baseT adapters.</p>
<p>The net.inet.tcp.sosend_agglim sysctl should not be used blindly; setting it to 12 will increase latency on 1Gb/s connections.<br />
Sepherosa Ziehau is planning to make this sysctl device specific in the future.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Justin Sherrill		</title>
		<link>https://www.dragonflydigest.com/2012/09/12/do-you-have-an-ixbge4/comment-page-1/#comment-45230</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Justin Sherrill]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Sep 2012 04:06:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.shiningsilence.com/dbsdlog/?p=10366#comment-45230</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[The commit itself mentions only the ixgbe card, so my first guess is yes, Intel only.  

Note that the improvement happens only in single-stream situations, so it may not matter if you&#039;re dealing with a situation where you have multiple connections adding up to fill the bandwidth on a 10G card.

Francois is on #dragonflybsd EFNet IRC frequently; that may be an easy way to follow up.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The commit itself mentions only the ixgbe card, so my first guess is yes, Intel only.  </p>
<p>Note that the improvement happens only in single-stream situations, so it may not matter if you&#8217;re dealing with a situation where you have multiple connections adding up to fill the bandwidth on a 10G card.</p>
<p>Francois is on #dragonflybsd EFNet IRC frequently; that may be an easy way to follow up.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Dean		</title>
		<link>https://www.dragonflydigest.com/2012/09/12/do-you-have-an-ixbge4/comment-page-1/#comment-45229</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dean]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Sep 2012 03:56:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.shiningsilence.com/dbsdlog/?p=10366#comment-45229</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[is this specific to the intel or to any 10gig nic? broadcoms and what not?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>is this specific to the intel or to any 10gig nic? broadcoms and what not?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
