<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Up-to-date packages and pkgsrc	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.dragonflydigest.com/2012/01/27/up-to-date-packages-and-pkgsrc/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.dragonflydigest.com/2012/01/27/up-to-date-packages-and-pkgsrc/</link>
	<description>A running description of activity related to DragonFly BSD.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 05 Feb 2012 20:08:28 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=7.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: ambushbloat		</title>
		<link>https://www.dragonflydigest.com/2012/01/27/up-to-date-packages-and-pkgsrc/comment-page-1/#comment-44481</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[ambushbloat]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Feb 2012 20:08:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.shiningsilence.com/dbsdlog/?p=9107#comment-44481</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In Red Hat&#039;s defence, RHEL 5 was released in 2007, where the newest Perl was 5.8; RHEL 6 in late 2010 (newest Perl 5.12, but they shipped 5.10). Anyone trying to create a server distro would not lightly upgrade something which so many packages depend on.

(Even then, Fedora, the testing platform for Red Hat usually known for bleeding edge software, has been a tad slow in adopting new Perl versions to my knowledge)

Anyway, the Perl community often recommends installing a (possibly newer) local Perl interpreter and using that for own scripts and development. Things are less likely to break that way.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In Red Hat&#8217;s defence, RHEL 5 was released in 2007, where the newest Perl was 5.8; RHEL 6 in late 2010 (newest Perl 5.12, but they shipped 5.10). Anyone trying to create a server distro would not lightly upgrade something which so many packages depend on.</p>
<p>(Even then, Fedora, the testing platform for Red Hat usually known for bleeding edge software, has been a tad slow in adopting new Perl versions to my knowledge)</p>
<p>Anyway, the Perl community often recommends installing a (possibly newer) local Perl interpreter and using that for own scripts and development. Things are less likely to break that way.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
