Comments on: New clang 3.0 and DragonFly work https://www.dragonflydigest.com/2011/11/17/new-clang-3-0-and-dragonfly-work/ A running description of activity related to DragonFly BSD. Fri, 18 Nov 2011 18:52:55 +0000 hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=7.1 By: Justin Sherrill https://www.dragonflydigest.com/2011/11/17/new-clang-3-0-and-dragonfly-work/comment-page-1/#comment-43763 Fri, 18 Nov 2011 18:52:55 +0000 http://www.shiningsilence.com/dbsdlog/?p=8707#comment-43763 I think so?

]]> By: Zoey4Ever https://www.dragonflydigest.com/2011/11/17/new-clang-3-0-and-dragonfly-work/comment-page-1/#comment-43760 Fri, 18 Nov 2011 06:10:49 +0000 http://www.shiningsilence.com/dbsdlog/?p=8707#comment-43760 Does Dfly (i.e. the kernel) run, too, when compiled with != gcc?

]]> By: Robert Seaton https://www.dragonflydigest.com/2011/11/17/new-clang-3-0-and-dragonfly-work/comment-page-1/#comment-43759 Fri, 18 Nov 2011 00:20:57 +0000 http://www.shiningsilence.com/dbsdlog/?p=8707#comment-43759 Great to see alternative compilers being explored. I’m personally torn between Clang and the Portable C Compiler. Clang has _seriously awesome_ error messages and great infrastructure, especially with LLVM and everything, and a fair bit of optimization, but being written in C and simplicity are two strong points in PCC’s favor.

Oh, well, too much choice is certainly a good problem to have!

]]>