<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Lazy Reading for 2011/07/17	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.dragonflydigest.com/2011/07/17/lazy-reading-for-20110717/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.dragonflydigest.com/2011/07/17/lazy-reading-for-20110717/</link>
	<description>A running description of activity related to DragonFly BSD.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 18 Jul 2011 20:57:48 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=7.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Beastie		</title>
		<link>https://www.dragonflydigest.com/2011/07/17/lazy-reading-for-20110717/comment-page-1/#comment-43048</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Beastie]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Jul 2011 20:57:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.shiningsilence.com/dbsdlog/?p=8042#comment-43048</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I did see this comment, and reading »FreeBSD is all about incorporating other people&#039;s software at this point (ZFS, DTrace, LLVM), and hasn&#039;t really originated a good idea in a decade.«

FreeBSD is the only *BSD with a functional NFSv4 implementation (OS X Lion will ship with NFSv4 support as well IIRC) to name just one feature, so I guess that statement is just FUD as well.

Also I&#039;m glad the BSDs don&#039;t have that NiH syndrome like other OSS projects. What will happen with DTrace and ZFS after Oracle closed the sources is another thing but they&#039;re still some fine pieces of technology.

Just my 2 cent.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I did see this comment, and reading »FreeBSD is all about incorporating other people&#8217;s software at this point (ZFS, DTrace, LLVM), and hasn&#8217;t really originated a good idea in a decade.«</p>
<p>FreeBSD is the only *BSD with a functional NFSv4 implementation (OS X Lion will ship with NFSv4 support as well IIRC) to name just one feature, so I guess that statement is just FUD as well.</p>
<p>Also I&#8217;m glad the BSDs don&#8217;t have that NiH syndrome like other OSS projects. What will happen with DTrace and ZFS after Oracle closed the sources is another thing but they&#8217;re still some fine pieces of technology.</p>
<p>Just my 2 cent.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
