Comments on: Padlock warning https://www.dragonflydigest.com/2011/06/18/padlock-warning/ A running description of activity related to DragonFly BSD. Sun, 19 Jun 2011 09:45:31 +0000 hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=7.1.3 By: Zoey4Ever https://www.dragonflydigest.com/2011/06/18/padlock-warning/comment-page-1/#comment-43005 Sun, 19 Jun 2011 09:45:31 +0000 http://www.shiningsilence.com/dbsdlog/?p=7970#comment-43005 There are also some patches for openssl to enable sha1/sha256 support found in newer VIA CPUs. Sadly, they haven’t found their way into openssl (yet) :(

http://git.alpinelinux.org/cgit/aports.git/tree/main/openssl

from http://groups.google.com/group/mailing.openssl.dev/browse_thread/thread/a280a7b4c27b1343

]]> By: alexh https://www.dragonflydigest.com/2011/06/18/padlock-warning/comment-page-1/#comment-43004 Sun, 19 Jun 2011 09:06:56 +0000 http://www.shiningsilence.com/dbsdlog/?p=7970#comment-43004 let me update that: works fine (has been tested) on both i386 and x86_64.

]]> By: alexh https://www.dragonflydigest.com/2011/06/18/padlock-warning/comment-page-1/#comment-43003 Sun, 19 Jun 2011 08:06:01 +0000 http://www.shiningsilence.com/dbsdlog/?p=7970#comment-43003 The i386 changes have been tested now and work fine. The x86_64 code is purely speculative as there is no documentation from via about what’s different.

]]>