<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: SMP kernels on uniprocessor systems	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.dragonflydigest.com/2011/05/14/smp-kernels-on-uniprocessor-systems/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.dragonflydigest.com/2011/05/14/smp-kernels-on-uniprocessor-systems/</link>
	<description>A running description of activity related to DragonFly BSD.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 18 May 2011 06:25:23 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Edward		</title>
		<link>https://www.dragonflydigest.com/2011/05/14/smp-kernels-on-uniprocessor-systems/comment-page-1/#comment-42907</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Edward]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 May 2011 06:25:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.shiningsilence.com/dbsdlog/?p=7786#comment-42907</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Does this work on x64?

I think this is a good move! I really miss the unification in Solaris that automatically picks the right kernel and things for you not only for SMP but also for 32/64bit.

A unified SMP/UP kernel is def a bit of must these days I would say. Was quite surprised at the commit, seems to simple to just change KASSERT() and a if statement O_o I guess there was a lot of work following up to this though.

Regards,]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Does this work on x64?</p>
<p>I think this is a good move! I really miss the unification in Solaris that automatically picks the right kernel and things for you not only for SMP but also for 32/64bit.</p>
<p>A unified SMP/UP kernel is def a bit of must these days I would say. Was quite surprised at the commit, seems to simple to just change KASSERT() and a if statement O_o I guess there was a lot of work following up to this though.</p>
<p>Regards,</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Thomas Nikolajsen		</title>
		<link>https://www.dragonflydigest.com/2011/05/14/smp-kernels-on-uniprocessor-systems/comment-page-1/#comment-42898</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Thomas Nikolajsen]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 May 2011 12:16:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.shiningsilence.com/dbsdlog/?p=7786#comment-42898</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Yes, this is good; it works here!
Two (UP) systems which before didn&#039;t boot SMP kernel (paniced with (something like) &#039;no local apic&#039;), now boots w/ SMP kernel.
It will be nice to have SMP kernel as default.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, this is good; it works here!<br />
Two (UP) systems which before didn&#8217;t boot SMP kernel (paniced with (something like) &#8216;no local apic&#8217;), now boots w/ SMP kernel.<br />
It will be nice to have SMP kernel as default.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
