<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: ipf goes away	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.dragonflydigest.com/2011/05/07/ipf-goes-away/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.dragonflydigest.com/2011/05/07/ipf-goes-away/</link>
	<description>A running description of activity related to DragonFly BSD.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 09 May 2011 17:08:59 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=7.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Amit Kulkarni		</title>
		<link>https://www.dragonflydigest.com/2011/05/07/ipf-goes-away/comment-page-1/#comment-42878</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Amit Kulkarni]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 May 2011 17:08:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.shiningsilence.com/dbsdlog/?p=7745#comment-42878</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Wait for OpenBSD 5.0/5.1 before synch as Henning &#038; co has found some bottlenecks in dupe IP checksumming.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wait for OpenBSD 5.0/5.1 before synch as Henning &amp; co has found some bottlenecks in dupe IP checksumming.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Adriel		</title>
		<link>https://www.dragonflydigest.com/2011/05/07/ipf-goes-away/comment-page-1/#comment-42877</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Adriel]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 May 2011 16:09:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.shiningsilence.com/dbsdlog/?p=7745#comment-42877</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Hello,

I am a little sorry to hear about ipf no longer being in Dragonfly BSD.  It is a great firewall package but can understand the project perhaps wanting to consolidate tools and focus on other areas.  

That said, I do enjoy working with IPFW more than any other BSD Firewall, and really like the way you can define different rulesets for IPv4 and IPv6 via rc.conf in Dragonfly.  PF is a great choice too of course.  Regardless, thanks for sharing your work with the rest of us.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hello,</p>
<p>I am a little sorry to hear about ipf no longer being in Dragonfly BSD.  It is a great firewall package but can understand the project perhaps wanting to consolidate tools and focus on other areas.  </p>
<p>That said, I do enjoy working with IPFW more than any other BSD Firewall, and really like the way you can define different rulesets for IPv4 and IPv6 via rc.conf in Dragonfly.  PF is a great choice too of course.  Regardless, thanks for sharing your work with the rest of us.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
