Comments on: Just continue with buildkernel for now https://www.dragonflydigest.com/2010/08/31/just-continue-with-buildkernel-for-now/ A running description of activity related to DragonFly BSD. Thu, 02 Sep 2010 00:01:08 +0000 hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=7.0 By: Justin Sherrill https://www.dragonflydigest.com/2010/08/31/just-continue-with-buildkernel-for-now/comment-page-1/#comment-41373 Thu, 02 Sep 2010 00:01:08 +0000 http://www.shiningsilence.com/dbsdlog/?p=6317#comment-41373 FUD seems a harsh term. I’m not trying to raise doubts about something through dire, overblown predictions. I’m reporting that Matt’s recommending a full buildworld process based on changes he made. I’m not running a 2.7 system, so I can’t try it myself to see. Geez, Sascha, you’re really getting me down lately.

]]> By: Samuel J. Greear https://www.dragonflydigest.com/2010/08/31/just-continue-with-buildkernel-for-now/comment-page-1/#comment-41371 Wed, 01 Sep 2010 20:13:52 +0000 http://www.shiningsilence.com/dbsdlog/?p=6317#comment-41371 Concur with Sascha, you really only need to resort to a full buildkernel/world if quick* blows up.

]]> By: Sascha Wildner https://www.dragonflydigest.com/2010/08/31/just-continue-with-buildkernel-for-now/comment-page-1/#comment-41370 Wed, 01 Sep 2010 19:56:19 +0000 http://www.shiningsilence.com/dbsdlog/?p=6317#comment-41370 This is just FUD.

I’ve been quickworld/kerneling across the whole select/poll and mpsafe changes times and nothing during that time ever broke that would have worked with a full buildkernel/world.

Sure, quick* don’t build from time to time. Well, just do a build* _then_.

I’m using quick* regularly (that is, every few days) over the past, dunno, 6 years?… basically since we have it, and there were maybe 5 cases all in all in that time, where quick* succeeded building but the result wouldn’t run _and_ it was fixed by doing a full build* cycle.

]]>