<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: New Hammer option	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.dragonflydigest.com/2009/07/11/new-hammer-option/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.dragonflydigest.com/2009/07/11/new-hammer-option/</link>
	<description>A running description of activity related to DragonFly BSD.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Jul 2009 19:02:38 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Joe "Floid" Kanowitz		</title>
		<link>https://www.dragonflydigest.com/2009/07/11/new-hammer-option/comment-page-1/#comment-33184</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Joe "Floid" Kanowitz]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Jul 2009 19:02:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.shiningsilence.com/dbsdlog/?p=4437#comment-33184</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Hm, haven&#039;t had a chance to be involved in a while (hence more blog comments), but how hard would it be to show the space &#039;consumed&#039; by the active snapshot (@@now) versus the entire filesystem?

That seems like it wouldn&#039;t be too hard while giving a bit of a hint on whether pruning is tuned correctly.  Though now that numerous history-retaining FSes are under development, perhaps df should be extended instead?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hm, haven&#8217;t had a chance to be involved in a while (hence more blog comments), but how hard would it be to show the space &#8216;consumed&#8217; by the active snapshot (@@now) versus the entire filesystem?</p>
<p>That seems like it wouldn&#8217;t be too hard while giving a bit of a hint on whether pruning is tuned correctly.  Though now that numerous history-retaining FSes are under development, perhaps df should be extended instead?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: lhmwzy		</title>
		<link>https://www.dragonflydigest.com/2009/07/11/new-hammer-option/comment-page-1/#comment-33129</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[lhmwzy]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 12 Jul 2009 23:29:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.shiningsilence.com/dbsdlog/?p=4437#comment-33129</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I want HAMMER would add and remove disk as ZFS does.
Whend can archive this?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I want HAMMER would add and remove disk as ZFS does.<br />
Whend can archive this?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
