<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: pkgsrc results ever improving	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.dragonflydigest.com/2008/10/06/pkgsrc-results-ever-improving/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.dragonflydigest.com/2008/10/06/pkgsrc-results-ever-improving/</link>
	<description>A running description of activity related to DragonFly BSD.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Oct 2008 21:29:41 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=7.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Joe "Floid" Kanowitz		</title>
		<link>https://www.dragonflydigest.com/2008/10/06/pkgsrc-results-ever-improving/comment-page-1/#comment-28270</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Joe "Floid" Kanowitz]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 Oct 2008 21:29:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.shiningsilence.com/dbsdlog/?p=3206#comment-28270</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I&#039;ve been trying not to stick my head up (and whine) on this, but libgtop should be really trivial to fix [for someone who knows what he/she is doing] - it just needs to be told about DF and upstream should be happy to accept the patches.

Those patches even existed at one point, though I haven&#039;t been able to find them, and weren&#039;t applied because upstream? was confused about whether DF and FreeBSD should&#039;ve been treated as one at the time.  [I think it&#039;s obvious now that the projects should be treated separately there.]

If no one else gets to it, I&#039;ll try to take a stab over the holidays or whenever I next have free time.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve been trying not to stick my head up (and whine) on this, but libgtop should be really trivial to fix [for someone who knows what he/she is doing] &#8211; it just needs to be told about DF and upstream should be happy to accept the patches.</p>
<p>Those patches even existed at one point, though I haven&#8217;t been able to find them, and weren&#8217;t applied because upstream? was confused about whether DF and FreeBSD should&#8217;ve been treated as one at the time.  [I think it&#8217;s obvious now that the projects should be treated separately there.]</p>
<p>If no one else gets to it, I&#8217;ll try to take a stab over the holidays or whenever I next have free time.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
