<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Performance improvements for vkernel	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.dragonflydigest.com/2008/03/22/performance-improvements-for-vkernel/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.dragonflydigest.com/2008/03/22/performance-improvements-for-vkernel/</link>
	<description>A running description of activity related to DragonFly BSD.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 23 Mar 2008 22:47:28 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Lazarus		</title>
		<link>https://www.dragonflydigest.com/2008/03/22/performance-improvements-for-vkernel/comment-page-1/#comment-20697</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Lazarus]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 Mar 2008 22:47:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.shiningsilence.com/dbsdlog/index.php/2008/03/22/2738.html#comment-20697</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Blah. Discussions on freebsd-hackers make my eyes bleed. Honestly, the OpenBSD ML and the LKML are friendlier ;^)

I really don&#039;t see how the DragonFly vkernel code and the related namespace cleanups are intrusive, as Kris claims. I can&#039;t understand how such minimal namespace changes in a development version of FreeBSD (as presumably any porting of the vkernel framework would be done in 8.0-CURRENT) would be so detrimental to FreeBSD as a whole because it would make more work for third parties who maintain binary only modules...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Blah. Discussions on freebsd-hackers make my eyes bleed. Honestly, the OpenBSD ML and the LKML are friendlier ;^)</p>
<p>I really don&#8217;t see how the DragonFly vkernel code and the related namespace cleanups are intrusive, as Kris claims. I can&#8217;t understand how such minimal namespace changes in a development version of FreeBSD (as presumably any porting of the vkernel framework would be done in 8.0-CURRENT) would be so detrimental to FreeBSD as a whole because it would make more work for third parties who maintain binary only modules&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
