<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Need better branding	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.dragonflydigest.com/2008/02/06/need-better-branding/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.dragonflydigest.com/2008/02/06/need-better-branding/</link>
	<description>A running description of activity related to DragonFly BSD.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 09 Feb 2008 03:14:50 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=7.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: justin		</title>
		<link>https://www.dragonflydigest.com/2008/02/06/need-better-branding/comment-page-1/#comment-18028</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[justin]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 Feb 2008 03:14:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.shiningsilence.com/dbsdlog/index.php/2008/02/06/2655.html#comment-18028</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Please please please don&#039;t say anything that sounds like BIKESHED.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Please please please don&#8217;t say anything that sounds like BIKESHED.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Joe "Floid" Kanowitz		</title>
		<link>https://www.dragonflydigest.com/2008/02/06/need-better-branding/comment-page-1/#comment-17987</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Joe "Floid" Kanowitz]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Feb 2008 18:34:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.shiningsilence.com/dbsdlog/index.php/2008/02/06/2655.html#comment-17987</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I was going to try to come up with something insightful here, but instead I&#039;ll just wonder if any backup frontend for HAMMER should be called TOOLSHED.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was going to try to come up with something insightful here, but instead I&#8217;ll just wonder if any backup frontend for HAMMER should be called TOOLSHED.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: John Marino		</title>
		<link>https://www.dragonflydigest.com/2008/02/06/need-better-branding/comment-page-1/#comment-17943</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[John Marino]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Feb 2008 08:41:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.shiningsilence.com/dbsdlog/index.php/2008/02/06/2655.html#comment-17943</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[People like &quot;Time Machine&quot;, the way Apple designed it.  Yes, the functionality has been around in various forms for a long time, but the ease of use isn&#039;t there.  I just pushed my father from decades of Windows usage to an iMac/Leopard a couple of weeks ago, and Time Machine was a big part of my sell.  Truth be told, I want one just like it on my BSD, Solaris, and Windows systems.  So I also saw FlyBack and another Linux called Time Vault.  So far they fall short and I think they are Linux-only anyway.

Count me with the folks that know backups are vital and just don&#039;t do it because it&#039;s too much effort.  If Dragonfly could implement Time Machine using the new HAMMER filesystem, that would be a real feather in the cap.  I understand that Leopard has low-level hooks for Time Machine which is why Flyback and Time Vault will never work as well, they have to rely on the rsync method of scanning everything.    I think Time Machine is helping Mac sales a lot, and that identical (and equally easy to use) functionality should migrate to all major OS.  It appears that Dragonfly could get a jump on the rest if HAMMER already or could easily support it.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>People like &#8220;Time Machine&#8221;, the way Apple designed it.  Yes, the functionality has been around in various forms for a long time, but the ease of use isn&#8217;t there.  I just pushed my father from decades of Windows usage to an iMac/Leopard a couple of weeks ago, and Time Machine was a big part of my sell.  Truth be told, I want one just like it on my BSD, Solaris, and Windows systems.  So I also saw FlyBack and another Linux called Time Vault.  So far they fall short and I think they are Linux-only anyway.</p>
<p>Count me with the folks that know backups are vital and just don&#8217;t do it because it&#8217;s too much effort.  If Dragonfly could implement Time Machine using the new HAMMER filesystem, that would be a real feather in the cap.  I understand that Leopard has low-level hooks for Time Machine which is why Flyback and Time Vault will never work as well, they have to rely on the rsync method of scanning everything.    I think Time Machine is helping Mac sales a lot, and that identical (and equally easy to use) functionality should migrate to all major OS.  It appears that Dragonfly could get a jump on the rest if HAMMER already or could easily support it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
