<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Java possible; Linux update needed	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.dragonflydigest.com/2007/10/07/java-possible-linux-update-needed/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.dragonflydigest.com/2007/10/07/java-possible-linux-update-needed/</link>
	<description>A running description of activity related to DragonFly BSD.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 11 Oct 2007 13:14:46 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: justin		</title>
		<link>https://www.dragonflydigest.com/2007/10/07/java-possible-linux-update-needed/comment-page-1/#comment-15268</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[justin]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Oct 2007 13:14:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.shiningsilence.com/dbsdlog/index.php/2007/10/07/2455.html#comment-15268</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[If you set BINPKG_SITES to one of the binary package mirrors, you can use prebuilt binaries whenever possible - makes it very quick to tear down and rebuild all your pkgsrc software, if that&#039;s what you end up doing.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you set BINPKG_SITES to one of the binary package mirrors, you can use prebuilt binaries whenever possible &#8211; makes it very quick to tear down and rebuild all your pkgsrc software, if that&#8217;s what you end up doing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Joe "Floid" Kanowitz		</title>
		<link>https://www.dragonflydigest.com/2007/10/07/java-possible-linux-update-needed/comment-page-1/#comment-15258</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Joe "Floid" Kanowitz]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Oct 2007 02:14:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.shiningsilence.com/dbsdlog/index.php/2007/10/07/2455.html#comment-15258</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I just realized I left this hanging, so I should mention that I&#039;m still trying to (and trying to find time to) debug the problem enough to define it -- the server runs, but it seems like specifying any client keels it over on sig11, even with the VESA drivers.

What I&#039;d really like to do is make sure *all* X11-server-related packages and libs are well and truly cleaned out and install fresh, without removing the rest of my pkgsrc tree.  Unfortunately, it seems like pkg_delete&#039;s recursive options would either blow out every X client on the system (eww) or leave libs that do need a rebuild (just in case...) lying around because other non-Xorg packages depend on them.

Renaming /usr/pkg for testing is an option, but not a pleasant one.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I just realized I left this hanging, so I should mention that I&#8217;m still trying to (and trying to find time to) debug the problem enough to define it &#8212; the server runs, but it seems like specifying any client keels it over on sig11, even with the VESA drivers.</p>
<p>What I&#8217;d really like to do is make sure *all* X11-server-related packages and libs are well and truly cleaned out and install fresh, without removing the rest of my pkgsrc tree.  Unfortunately, it seems like pkg_delete&#8217;s recursive options would either blow out every X client on the system (eww) or leave libs that do need a rebuild (just in case&#8230;) lying around because other non-Xorg packages depend on them.</p>
<p>Renaming /usr/pkg for testing is an option, but not a pleasant one.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Sam		</title>
		<link>https://www.dragonflydigest.com/2007/10/07/java-possible-linux-update-needed/comment-page-1/#comment-15238</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Sam]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Oct 2007 19:44:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.shiningsilence.com/dbsdlog/index.php/2007/10/07/2455.html#comment-15238</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[There is a native version of Java for FreeBSD in /usr/ports/java/jdk14

http://www.freebsd.org/java/]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There is a native version of Java for FreeBSD in /usr/ports/java/jdk14</p>
<p><a href="http://www.freebsd.org/java/" rel="nofollow ugc">http://www.freebsd.org/java/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Justin Sherrill		</title>
		<link>https://www.dragonflydigest.com/2007/10/07/java-possible-linux-update-needed/comment-page-1/#comment-15235</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Justin Sherrill]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Oct 2007 16:43:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.shiningsilence.com/dbsdlog/index.php/2007/10/07/2455.html#comment-15235</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[You know, I was about to say &quot;works fine for me&quot;, but I just realized that I have xorg 1.2 installed on this system.  

Have you filed a bug report to the pkgsrc folks?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You know, I was about to say &#8220;works fine for me&#8221;, but I just realized that I have xorg 1.2 installed on this system.  </p>
<p>Have you filed a bug report to the pkgsrc folks?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Joe "Floid" Kanowitz		</title>
		<link>https://www.dragonflydigest.com/2007/10/07/java-possible-linux-update-needed/comment-page-1/#comment-15234</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Joe "Floid" Kanowitz]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Oct 2007 16:29:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.shiningsilence.com/dbsdlog/index.php/2007/10/07/2455.html#comment-15234</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I hate to be constantly moaning, but I think working X11 would be even more useful. ;)

Seriously, am I the only person having strange problems with 1.3, or is it that the majority of DFers have stuck with 6.9 to avoid migration issues?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I hate to be constantly moaning, but I think working X11 would be even more useful. ;)</p>
<p>Seriously, am I the only person having strange problems with 1.3, or is it that the majority of DFers have stuck with 6.9 to avoid migration issues?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Justin Sherrill		</title>
		<link>https://www.dragonflydigest.com/2007/10/07/java-possible-linux-update-needed/comment-page-1/#comment-15225</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Justin Sherrill]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Oct 2007 04:03:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.shiningsilence.com/dbsdlog/index.php/2007/10/07/2455.html#comment-15225</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Does the FreeBSD port assume a Linux 2.6 kernel for syscall emulation?  That&#039;s the kicker, as I understand it.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Does the FreeBSD port assume a Linux 2.6 kernel for syscall emulation?  That&#8217;s the kicker, as I understand it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Sam		</title>
		<link>https://www.dragonflydigest.com/2007/10/07/java-possible-linux-update-needed/comment-page-1/#comment-15220</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Sam]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Oct 2007 19:46:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.shiningsilence.com/dbsdlog/index.php/2007/10/07/2455.html#comment-15220</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Will the FreeBSD port not work ?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Will the FreeBSD port not work ?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
