<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: AMD64 support for 2.0?	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.dragonflydigest.com/2007/05/14/amd64-support-for-20/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.dragonflydigest.com/2007/05/14/amd64-support-for-20/</link>
	<description>A running description of activity related to DragonFly BSD.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 22 Jun 2007 20:24:04 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=7.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: justin		</title>
		<link>https://www.dragonflydigest.com/2007/05/14/amd64-support-for-20/comment-page-1/#comment-12876</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[justin]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 May 2007 18:07:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.shiningsilence.com/dbsdlog/index.php/2007/05/14/2255.html#comment-12876</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Yeah, I think it was the time of all the header reorganization, when Matt created the platform, machine, machine_arch, etc. values.  

Shiningsilence.com uses a AMD processor (socket 754), so I&#039;d be happy to have have support for it - not that I&#039;ve noticed any CPU performance issues to date.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah, I think it was the time of all the header reorganization, when Matt created the platform, machine, machine_arch, etc. values.  </p>
<p>Shiningsilence.com uses a AMD processor (socket 754), so I&#8217;d be happy to have have support for it &#8211; not that I&#8217;ve noticed any CPU performance issues to date.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Gergo Szakal		</title>
		<link>https://www.dragonflydigest.com/2007/05/14/amd64-support-for-20/comment-page-1/#comment-12875</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Gergo Szakal]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 May 2007 17:47:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.shiningsilence.com/dbsdlog/index.php/2007/05/14/2255.html#comment-12875</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I know the difference between the two, but somewhere I read about &quot;pc64&quot; ports meaning x86_64 and ia64.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I know the difference between the two, but somewhere I read about &#8220;pc64&#8221; ports meaning x86_64 and ia64.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Joe "Floid" Kanowitz		</title>
		<link>https://www.dragonflydigest.com/2007/05/14/amd64-support-for-20/comment-page-1/#comment-12871</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Joe "Floid" Kanowitz]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 May 2007 16:14:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.shiningsilence.com/dbsdlog/index.php/2007/05/14/2255.html#comment-12871</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[&quot;Itanium 64s?&quot;

Intel&#039;s marchitecture for AMD64-compatibles was &quot;EM64T&quot; (apparently &quot;Intel 64,&quot; now), shipped under the Xeon/Pentium #/Core brands, so I&#039;m wondering if this means you&#039;re actually using Itaniums (&quot;IA-64&quot;) in the wild. :)

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Em64t#Differences_between_AMD64_and_Intel_64 looks interesting for people like me who (for lack of anything interesting supporting 64-bit mode) haven&#039;t been paying attention.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Itanium 64s?&#8221;</p>
<p>Intel&#8217;s marchitecture for AMD64-compatibles was &#8220;EM64T&#8221; (apparently &#8220;Intel 64,&#8221; now), shipped under the Xeon/Pentium #/Core brands, so I&#8217;m wondering if this means you&#8217;re actually using Itaniums (&#8220;IA-64&#8221;) in the wild. :)</p>
<p><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Em64t#Differences_between_AMD64_and_Intel_64" rel="nofollow ugc">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Em64t#Differences_between_AMD64_and_Intel_64</a> looks interesting for people like me who (for lack of anything interesting supporting 64-bit mode) haven&#8217;t been paying attention.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Gergo Szakal		</title>
		<link>https://www.dragonflydigest.com/2007/05/14/amd64-support-for-20/comment-page-1/#comment-12830</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Gergo Szakal]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 May 2007 21:44:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.shiningsilence.com/dbsdlog/index.php/2007/05/14/2255.html#comment-12830</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Would be cool, because most servers out there are either shipped with Opterons or Itanium 64&#039;s (and usually contain more than 4 GB RAM). I can of course test this once it&#039;s in a working stage.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Would be cool, because most servers out there are either shipped with Opterons or Itanium 64&#8217;s (and usually contain more than 4 GB RAM). I can of course test this once it&#8217;s in a working stage.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
