<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: KTR being worked on	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.dragonflydigest.com/2004/09/03/ktr-being-worked-on/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.dragonflydigest.com/2004/09/03/ktr-being-worked-on/</link>
	<description>A running description of activity related to DragonFly BSD.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 Sep 2004 17:03:01 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=7.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Lazarus		</title>
		<link>https://www.dragonflydigest.com/2004/09/03/ktr-being-worked-on/comment-page-1/#comment-371</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Lazarus]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Sep 2004 17:03:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.shiningsilence.com/dbsdlog/?p=626#comment-371</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[See Matt&#039;s followup: 
http://leaf.dragonflybsd.org/mailarchive/kernel/2004-09/msg00010.html

&quot;I don&#039;t know about this.  It (the FreeBSD code) looks poorly designed to me.

Also, the FreeBSD code probably used mutexes where you are using a token. For ktr_tracepoint() to be callable from &#039;anywhere&#039; you can&#039;t use a token there but must instead convert the code to use a critical section and per-cpu arrays.

Also, 1024 entries is probably not nearly enough for a tracepoint utility to be useful.  We&#039;d need a lot of entries... a million or more, for it to be really useful, which implies dynamically allocating the array at boot time rather then declaring it static.&quot;

-Matthew Dillon
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>See Matt&#8217;s followup:<br />
<a href="http://leaf.dragonflybsd.org/mailarchive/kernel/2004-09/msg00010.html" rel="nofollow ugc">http://leaf.dragonflybsd.org/mailarchive/kernel/2004-09/msg00010.html</a></p>
<p>&#8220;I don&#8217;t know about this.  It (the FreeBSD code) looks poorly designed to me.</p>
<p>Also, the FreeBSD code probably used mutexes where you are using a token. For ktr_tracepoint() to be callable from &#8216;anywhere&#8217; you can&#8217;t use a token there but must instead convert the code to use a critical section and per-cpu arrays.</p>
<p>Also, 1024 entries is probably not nearly enough for a tracepoint utility to be useful.  We&#8217;d need a lot of entries&#8230; a million or more, for it to be really useful, which implies dynamically allocating the array at boot time rather then declaring it static.&#8221;</p>
<p>-Matthew Dillon</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
