<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: IPI Hypnosis	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.dragonflydigest.com/2004/07/19/ipi-hypnosis/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.dragonflydigest.com/2004/07/19/ipi-hypnosis/</link>
	<description>A running description of activity related to DragonFly BSD.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 20 Jul 2004 18:16:15 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Lazarus		</title>
		<link>https://www.dragonflydigest.com/2004/07/19/ipi-hypnosis/comment-page-1/#comment-323</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Lazarus]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Jul 2004 18:16:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.shiningsilence.com/dbsdlog/?p=528#comment-323</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[The really sad thing is that most people think that Matt is joking when he suggests that FreeBSD should incorporate DragonFly&#039;s IPI messaging subsystem, when in fact he is serious. 

I&#039;m no expert, but the more I read about both approaches, and the more benchmarks I see, the more I am convinced that the DragonFly developers ideas and implementations really are superior to the equivelant functionality and infrastructure in FreeBSD 5. 
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The really sad thing is that most people think that Matt is joking when he suggests that FreeBSD should incorporate DragonFly&#8217;s IPI messaging subsystem, when in fact he is serious. </p>
<p>I&#8217;m no expert, but the more I read about both approaches, and the more benchmarks I see, the more I am convinced that the DragonFly developers ideas and implementations really are superior to the equivelant functionality and infrastructure in FreeBSD 5. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
