Comments on: Short subversion discussion https://www.dragonflydigest.com/2004/02/01/short-subversion-discussion/ A running description of activity related to DragonFly BSD. Wed, 04 Feb 2004 00:07:13 +0000 hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=7.0.2 By: Julien Gabel https://www.dragonflydigest.com/2004/02/01/short-subversion-discussion/comment-page-1/#comment-114 Wed, 04 Feb 2004 00:07:13 +0000 http://www.shiningsilence.com/dbsdlog/?p=237#comment-114 What about the GNU/Arch(*) project? Its aim seems to
be very interesting ; are there any experience (good
or bad) with this revision control system?

(*)http://www.gnu.org/directory/sysadmin/Version_control/arch.html

]]> By: DragonFly_Guy https://www.dragonflydigest.com/2004/02/01/short-subversion-discussion/comment-page-1/#comment-113 Mon, 02 Feb 2004 12:16:24 +0000 http://www.shiningsilence.com/dbsdlog/?p=237#comment-113 It appears as though Mr. Dillon prefers to stick with cvs. It may not be the best thing around (I like it) but it’s something that many people are familliar with.

]]>